Just a little area to discuss anything and everything. Have your say here

Thursday, June 23, 2005

The Great Michelin Debate.

Last weekend was the darkest weekend in Formula One’s long and torrid history as we saw the farce that was a six car procession, as no one was really on racing terms with anyone, and it was very much a manufactured result in the up-most.

But why?

Indianapolis is a unique track in the way that it is a NASCAR track primarily, which hosts a grand prix on an infield section whilst running a small segment of the oval NASCAR track. This involves an F1 car running at speeds of more than 200mph along a right hand corner, banked at 9 degrees. It doesn’t sound much, I know, but it’s a tenth of perpendicular. It is a pretty big fraction. Because the NASCAR cars weren’t getting enough grip as they flew round this corner a few months before the Grand Prix, the track was diamond cut, making it ultra grippy by dramatically increasing the friction forces between track and tyre. The extra grip is all well and good, but it creates more heat in the tyre, wearing the tyres down much faster.

So, Michelin brought tyres over the ocean as to suit the configuration of last years track surface, which makes perfect sense, I don’t think they were given much information about the new diamond cut track surface. This though, caused huge problems. With much more down force than with NASCAR’s, the F1 cars were generating too much friction between tyre and track, resulting in huge temperature build ups in the tyre, the wearing of the sidewall of the tyre and then failure through fatigue of the tyre sidewall. In short, the rear left went ‘POP’ at 200mph sending the car and driver hurtling into a wall at speeds in excess of 190mph. As happened with Ralf Schumacher in Friday practice, highlighting that there might be a problem.

Michelin performed tests on the tyres, but could not find the actual route of the tyre failures, but nonetheless knew that they were unsafe to race, and would most likely fail 10 – 15 laps into usage. They then had no choice but to tell the teams that the tyres were unsafe to race at full speed through the now infamous Turn 13.

The fact that this was known on Friday evening, and no workable solution could be found by Sunday by a group of adults is laughable.

Never the less, the tyres were run at much higher pressures for the one qualifying lap they had to complete, whilst new tyres were shipped over from France.

Here’s where it begins to get complicated.

Bringing a new tyre to a Grand Prix weekend is against regulations, so the FIA blocked this move.

Installing a chicane before Turn 12, so the cars ran no faster than 177mph (a safe speed apparently) through Turn 13 was blocked by Max Mosley – I think – or the FIA as the track could not be changed under regulations. Odd, I know, but the new braking area might test brakes beyond their expected load and throw a few teams out of kilter. Safety would also have to be taken into consideration, as chicanes normally mean a crash or something more times than not.

As the Michelin shod teams (7 out of the 10 competing) tried to battle it out in meeting after meeting in search of a compromise, so as to at least out a show on for all the viewing public. They offered to race starting behind the Bridgestone runners and without winning championship points, so handing the advantage to the three Bridgestone teams whilst keeping the show going for the paying fans.

Unfortunately, these meetings came to nothing as Max Mosley (The President of the FIA) would only say that the Michelin teams should run slower through the corner so as to be safe for their tyres, without any other alteration or consideration. But, how slow is slow? And how safe would it really be? The loads would still be going through the tyres, and the risk to the Bridgestone teams which could still go at 200mph through the corner whilst the others had to go more than 40mph slower would be considerable, as this kind of speed differential is more than just slightly risky.

The result of these failed negotiations was the spine chilling sight those who watched on Sunday saw. A 20 car formation grid set off, only for 14 of these to pull into the pit lane before taking to the real starting grid, leaving the 2 Ferraris, the 2 Jordans and the 2 Minardis (who only raced because the Jordans did) alone on the grid. It was much more than a dull race, with the Ferraris barely racing each other at all, and the other 4 a lap apart from each other in a different race on their own.

The fall out for these failures will be hard felt, and Formula One’s future in the U.S. will never really recover from such a hit. Sponsors will be doubtful, and the in-fighting within F1’s ranks has now hit the lime light in a more ugly way than predicted. Litigation proceedings will be going underway, as fans demand heir money back – even though, by rules and regulations, there was a race. All seven of the Michelin teams have been called to a hearing on Wednesday 29th June in Paris, whilst calls for Max Mosley’s resignation are heard from a variety of sources.

There’s no doubt that the sport has been brought into disrepute over what happened at the weekend at Indianapolis, but the damage will not hit F1 in Europe quite as hard as F1 in America. It’s a disappointment that such a farce could happen, but the fall out from will have repercussions like we’ve never seen.

R.I.P. F1 in America.

Good luck F1!

6 Comments:

Blogger Scotty said...

Fantastic and well thought-out insight into the incidents last Sunday in the F1 race...that was superb to read, so much so that i wanted it to be even lengthier! Well explained to the less keyed up readers of F1 like me, and if you haven't read it yet do so, it's worth it even if your interest in F1 isn't so great.

There are some puzzling things in all of that. How was it that the Bridgestone tyres were able to cope with such friction and potentially disastorous damage, yet the Michelin ones simply couldn't? Surely any F1 tyre is going to suffer, regardless of brand or type, when the track is designed for NASCAR races which as you say have much less down force acting on the vehicle compared to those F1 cars.

The tyres, which were to be imported in from France, were surely a safety measure and thus should have been viewed as a sensible move to ensure the safety of the drivers? Why on earth would you be so stubborn as to block it as a strategical manoeuvre? It beggars belief that something couldn't be organised, especially for a race with a potential new market.

One final idiot's guide question..who won the race, and did it constitute a race at all with the allocation of points for the six racers?

Jonah

10:55 am

 
Blogger Paul said...

Right, well.

The Bridgestone tyres survived for many reasons. Most importantly:
1) They knew about the higher levels of grip after supplying some of the NASCAR racers a few weeks prior.
2) Bridgestone build their tyre in a very different way to Michelin, so their tyres had no problem with the higher temperatures.

The move to bring new tyres over wasn't blocked, but not allowed by the regulations, and not abiding by these would have brought much larger penalties onto Michelin and their teams.

The result was:
1. M Schumacher
2. R Barrichello
3. T Monteiro
4. N Karthikeyan
5. C Albers
6. P Freisacher

On a footnote though. Max Mosely came out saying, it's not F1's primary function to entertain. It's a sport first and foremost that people find entertaining. But, why have a public vote about how to mke F1 better and more entertaining, Max?

8:38 pm

 
Blogger Scotty said...

Thanks for the feed-back to my numerous queries. It makes sense more now but there are still a few things which don't seem logical about the difference of tyres. However, the difference in the tyres between Bridgestone and Michelin was the key factor in all of the saga or so it appears. Few more pertinent points (as Big Nige likes to say) to add...
1) Would it be at all possible to blame the Ferrari F1 team in this for being the only team to not vote for a change the lay out of the track?

2) What exactly does the future hold, well in your eyes, for F1 in America? Can it possibly recover from such a blunder?

3) When's the next race and is this incident expected to loom over these up and coming events with any sorts of protest or argument?

Just get back to me whenever you can and I hope that more people put forward their thoughts on this, as Chris was one who asked about my Q no.1

Jonah

7:57 pm

 
Blogger Paul said...

I am happy to say, no, it is not possible to blame Ferrari for their part in this. They had the correct tyres, they hadn't done anything wrong. They themselves had been punished by the one-tyre system, and this was almost their payback. Ferrari took as little a part as possible in the discussions of the solution, and even if they had voted to have a chicane installed, the FIA wouldn't have permitted it anyway. Ferrari, on this one, are very much an innocent party who watched rather than got involved.

F1 in America? Ahh, an interesting nut. I don't think it can recover at Indianapolis. The crowds are hurt and it doesn't draw capacity crowds at the best of times. The U.S. has been victim of other F1 incidents in it's four years, with the manufactured Ferrari 1-2 when Michael tried to have a dead heat with Barrihello, but actually pulled off too much and let Barrichello have the victory, and the black flagging of Montoya for a minor incident, ruing his chances in the F1 Championship, as the race was the penulitmate one of that season. Moving venue might help soothe the problem a little bit, but I think it will struggle to find prominence in the U.S. for some time after this. Although Michelin are doing their best, and are offering refunds to all the fans who paid for tickets, which might help soften the blow slightly.

Finally, the next race is this very weekend at Magny-Cours, France. I don't expect to have too much fall out from the U.S. disrupting the race weekend. The problem came because of one unique corner at Indy, out of the hundreds of corners at all the tracks in the world. No, expect Michelin to be fighting fit and back in action at the front. Although, the Jordans and Minardis qualifying late on in the session wil prove interesting.

And, after the FIA hearing today in Paris, where the seven Michelin teams were charged with 5 different counts, they have been found guilty of only two of them. One of failing to bring the correct tyre to a Grand Prix (although this was Michelin's fault, not the teams) and the other for pulling out of the race unnecessarily when the pit lane could have been used every lap. (This in itself would have been dangerous, as 14 cars through the pitlane for every single lap of the 73 racing laps would have made the pitlane like a constant stream of cars at 80kph, which just isn't safe for all the pit crews and personnel in the pitlane. A highly unsatifactory solution!) Safe to say, the teams are appealing against this decision, but their punishment if still found guilty will not be found out until September after the Belgian Grand Prix at Spa. It will all depend on what they do to compensate the fans in the meanwhile, and make sure they don't try anything similar either, as stricter penalties will be dealt out if that happens. It's most likely to be a fine though, rather than stopping them from racing (or inducing another Indy farce) or deducting them points, as that punishment wouldn't fit the crime!

Nice to help with the questions though!

See you Sat!

9:28 pm

 
Blogger Scotty said...

That is one phenomenal reply by the one and only and it was a pleasure to read how well balanced and so informed your opinion of F1 is. I was sure that you would say that about Ferrari and that appears to be the overall concencus about their role in the fiasco. I think the fans should be refunded but by the F1 authorities themselves rather than Michelin who only acted due to safety reasons which is better giving full priority to the entertainment value.

However, I have had all of my possible questions answered it's just more a case of...why are (not)they doing that? Purely rhetorical, you see.

Jonah

4:19 pm

 
Blogger Adriana said...

me no nothing of f1. truth be told me think me know enough with knowinghow to spell my name ;p
but am looking forward to today's edition and will (of course)state my opinion if I have one o the matter
Adriana
Xxx

6:36 pm

 

Post a Comment

<< Home